
Talk about over the top
June 10, 2009Got a feeling mein host may have mentioned something about this to me a coupla weeks ago. Not that I was paying much attention. Pretty much par for the course with our conversations.
He says something. I don’t pay attention. Or I don’t hear. Amounts to the same thing really. Then I say something and he ignores me. Bastard Nordic oaf. Dunno why we bother talking at all really.
Anyway, got a sneaking suspicion he said something about this. About High Street pubs in the arse-end of the Universe that’s known as Bedford demanding to see ID before they’ll serve anyone with alcohol that they think may be under… wait for it… 30!
Yep. That’s what I said. 30. Three bloody zero!
As I say, I didn’t pay too much attention. Well, I wouldn’t, would I? What with me being way past that anyway.
Until I spotted this sign in the Bankers Draft (a pub just over the road from where I happened to be at the time).
Not quite believing what I was seeing I bunged on the long lens just to get a better look…
S’pose I could have gone across the road… but, dammit, that would have entailed walking!
Sure enough. If you look under 30 they’re gonna ask to see ID.
Now correct me if I’m wrong (and I’m sure mein host will, what with him being a bit of a know-it-all on things licensed trade related) but last time I looked I’m sure the minimum legal alcohol purchasing age was 18. In the good old U Nanny State K at least.
Now for alcohol-flogging establishments to check IDs up to say 21 I can understand. But 30? That’s just taking the piss.
There’s a coupla points here:
1) If I were, say, 29 years old and went into a pub for a drink and the idiot behind the bar asked for ID I’d likely as not tell him (or her even) to bugger off and I’d vacate that establishment for somewhere much friendlier (before being thrown out of course). And likely as not I wouldn’t go back there ever again. And if I were a moderately heavy drinker or regular pub goer then they would have lost a damn good customer. And money!
And I’d make sure to tell all my friends not to frequent the bloody nosey-parker place as well.
So a bit of an own goal really.
2) By implementing a policy such as that what they’re actually saying is that their bar staff can’t tell the difference between someone aged 17 and someone aged 30.
Now being unable to discern whether someone’s 17 or 19, or 20, or even 21 I can sort of understand. But 17 and 30? Oh get real. If they can’t distinguish between a 17-year-old and a 30-year-old then they should be bloody sacked. No right to be behind a bar in the first place.
I wouldn’t be at all surprised, either, if someone with the balls and the inclination could probably mount some sort of legal challenge to this stupid, utterly stupid, policy.
And as for Bedford’s Bankers Draft, and all the rest of the pubs of that ilk, well, they can just sling their hook. Hope they all go bust! And hope their stupid sodding bar staff that can’t tell someone who’s 17 from someone who’s 30 never work in a pub again.
Bloody idiots.






This ere under 30 nonsense is actually the brainchild of the local authority led by Keith Simmons and if they get their way all pubs will have said challenge 30 scheme and Wetherspoons are such a kiss arse company they will literally bend over and take up the arse if they thought it would keep them in good grace.
There is one club called Newyork Newkork that has had the challenge 30 added as a stipulation on their licence!.
Being in the trade I have seen policies implemented that lead to the suffering of the trade in general,
not to mention the blatant entrapment regarding under age sales, but only by our local authority, I believe all the other authorities in the country are working with the pubs and clubs not against
What a bunch of little Hitlers, Cunts the lot of them.
Oh, I might have guessed that little shit Simmons was behind it. Jumped-up bureaucrat on a power trip. Thinks the Council’s God and should dictate to everyone how to run their lives. Scumbag.
But where’s he get this stupid 30 business from? Does he actually know what the legal drinking age is? On what basis does he think he’s got the bloody right to encourage pubs to ask punters who’re clearly over the legal drinking age for ID.
And as for the bloody entrapment scam… don’t even get me started on that.
Simmons? I think he’s lost sight of the fact he’s supposed to be a public servant, not a bloody dictator.
And lets not forget the sham that is Bedsafe, a scheme which is supposed to be run by the publicans of the town with support from local authority but it has gone the other way, with the local authority using it to dictate policy and force pubs to do thing’s their way, through fear of losing licenses and what not, fuckers.
Personaly I have got no time for it.
Ah yes, Bedsafe. I seem to recollect that’s another thing thee an’ me were gonna have a rant about at some point. Either thee. Or me. Or both.
I also seem to recollect I’ve still got some pics lurking on me hard drive relevant to that. Mebbe not just yet though.
But talking of pics… can you please please upload some more pics to Flickr. I’m getting right fed up seeing my mug on that Flickr badge of yours!